Table 4.
Population, cumulative estimated exposure, and cumulative
population estimated exposure, for the 19 communities receiving a
cumulative population estimated exposure in excess of 1,000 person-R
during 1951-1958.
Cumulative
Location®
Population
Cumulative
population
estimated
estimated
exposure,
exposure,
R
Saint George, UT
person-R
5,000
3.7
Las Vegas, NV
47,000
0.21
9,900
Hurricane, UT
1,375
3.5
4,800
Ely, NV
3,558
1.2
4,300
Cedar City, UT
6,106
0.64
3,900
100 to 500
6.0
3,000°
McGill, NV
2,297
0.77
1,800
Tonopah, NV
1,375
1.1
1,500
Washington, UT
435
3.3
1,400
La Verkin, UT
387
3.7
1,400
Santa Clara, UT
319
4.3
1,400
Mesquite, NV
590
2.1
1,200
East Ely, NV
Ruth, NV.
1,000
-1,244
1.2
0.95
1,200
1,200
4.5
1,100
Kanab, UT
Lincoln Mine, NV
North Las Vegas, NV
Bunkerville, NV
1,900
1.6
13,000
250
0.20
18,000
3,100
2,600
Panguitch, UT
1,500
0.70
1,000
Pioche, NV
1,392
0.74
1,000
Total
89,228°
|
64,000°
“Reno, NV, according to our calculation, received a population
estimated exposure of 1600 person-R and would therefore rank tenth
in population estimated exposure.
Ocalculated by using a population of 500 at Lincoln Mine.
230