DR.
ANSPAUGH:
Okay.
If
I
may
have the first viewgraph,
David.
(LRA-41).
From our original discussions,
I think at the very first meeting of
this_Committee and even its predecessor committee, we wrestled with the
problem of what do we do about areas that are really beyond the original
estimates of exposure, external exposure, and how do we deal with it and
how far “do we go.
I think we always agreed that additional measurements
wou Id be usefuT>.
This is actually an old viewgraph, from many meetings
ago, and we generally concluded that it, would be useful to have con10 temporary measurements of the deposition of radionuclides in a broader geoll
graphical area and: F-don't think that we have ever come to a reasonable way
12 of saying where we will,draw that line, but, nevertheless,
13 everybody felt that the”original
I think that
fallout patterns were not extended far
14 enough to answer all of the questions that we had.
15
Some of the methods that we-proposed were aircraft measurements, field
16
spectrometry and soil sampling.
17
all of these methods.
18
of the NURE aircraft data and the Phase II that we initiated following the
19
May meeting has extensively used the techniques of field spectrometry to
20
measure the cesium flux and also soil sampling so that's just to emphasize,
21
again,
22
where we can calculate doses.
23
Harold Beck discussed the analysis that he is doing
that this whole process
The
next
As_ it.turns out, we are actually pursuing
viewgraph
is being undertaken to extend the region
~
(LRA-42)
indicates
.
the— dose
determination
24
methodology that's based upon these techniques and—this,I would like to
25
emphasize,
26
demonstration of this technique throughout Utah, but, basically, the key to
27
this whole business
28
at a site at some estimated time of arrival.
is based upon the work that EML has done primarily, and their
is to calculate the amount of cesium-137 that arrived
189
Now,
if we can in fact cal-