Also-
-
BRUES:
aw
low enough so that we didn't really have to worry apout it,
ture is turned on, lauren?
or
we obviously said it was high enough to be interesting but
BRUES:
in ten minutes instead of 25 minutes and we can continue with
wo
N
‘Yes, but very, very small amounts,
Ww
EISENBUD:
Do you want to say anything before the pic-
our discussion if anyone has anything to discuss until twelve
10
o'clock , and we'll show the picture later in the day,
ii
oné mun out of talk?
DONALDSON:
Let it be turned on then,
DOBSON:
12
No,
~-
Lunch will be had
Every-
I would like to ask Tauren Donaldson a
13
question,
14
question is too large.
15 -°
that you've had over the years with your ecological studies,
16
what kind of situation would you visualize, let's say, in the
17
western part or region, the Washingtm.region of the United
138
States if a sizable number of nuclear devices were exploded?
19
I'm thinking of the aquatic animals, the river systems, the
20
terrestrial, and so forth,
21
mean an overwhelming number, but choose your number,
22
Ferheps it's not too well phrased .and perhaps the
DONALDSON:
But extrapolating from the experiences
It's a fuzzy question.
I don't
One® could approach this with 190 degree
23
differences either way,
25
say for the sake of argument, we would have to go back to our
25
original comment that in water you are dealing with a three-
26
dimensional aspect.
27
nucleides.,
28
and they are selectively pickai atby different sections of the
29
biota,
30
vertebrates, you have the food chain sertes,
31
the food chain is one interested in fish, the herbivores teing
32
more specific than the carnivores?
33
rent there would not be an effect, there would be an effect,
If one wanted to choose for the moment,
You deal immediately with fractionate of
Then you have selective concentration of nucleides
In vertebrates as a group being different almost than
Which stage of
So to make a blank state-
Siatiord warren -
DopucLA
°/