——
1
a
+
:
aod
14
‘
1
- ata
‘
TIME AFTER SHOT
jp
{HR}
oT
r
SLOPE OF CURVE,
95% CONFIDENCE LIMITS
bed
ff
oo
~1 B85 +027
~1 3514 0.012
-1 209 + 0007
010-013
013-027
Oo27-175
175-6.0
60 -11.8
115-230
230-349
~1 084 + 0008
by
-0.869 + O02
NO DATA
~).322 £ OO'5
—r
hot
Fo
.
——
GAMMA
DOSE
RATES
eet
ee
a a ee
REL ATIVE
ee
'
{
‘
|
4.
\
be wd
}
jt
4
|
\
|
[
t
!
|
Il
\
!
!
|;
\
7
oO
INTERPOL ATION
}
L
{ i
Ped
4.
+
Brey’
oN
1
1
J
‘iL
NM
|
*
\
!
'
t
Oo
'
io
10
°
o
BEST AVAILABLE COPY
Umbrelia,
Figure 3.4)
aay
.
t
en-linn curves
,
Ratios of do Se rat
e inad acent wa
ter to average do
Effects of possible 30se r ate on weat
her
second timing er
de cks of DD 593,
rors are Indicat ed
Shot
by the tw 0 brok
a
t
r
Co
Lot
Too
TIME AFTER SHOT (HR)
Figure 3.42 Gamma-ionization decay of contaminant collected
in 6~inch-thick lead cave on DD 592, Shot Umbrella.
77
\
\