-26-
This issue should be recast from an estimation problem
to a "define the boundary" problem.
Healy:
Has this been suggested to DNA?
Barnes:
Bair:
I'm not in a position to do so.
Would the Army be amenable?
Barnes:
Healy:
Probably.
The objective really is to locate the problem and get rid
of it.
Don't mess around with averages.
Thompson:
The answer is simple:
Dig it up on Boken;
Leave it on Enjebi.
But this must be worded carefully.
Barnes:
There are two areas near the surface on Enjebi.
Thompson:
Healy:
How do you word it carefully?
The group has reviewed the issue of subsurface contamination
and concluded that Op Plan is not operable for these situations:
The material on Boken should be removed,
The material on Enjebi should be left as is except to
remove the asphalt.
McCraw:
Add that it's a very site specific problem and that we don't
have enough information.
Templeton:
Thompson:
The Op Plan is good for generic issues, but specific issue
should be addressed on a case-by-case basis.
Templeton:
McCraw:
*Bair:
The Op Plan was written before the specific situations arose.
What do the DOE field people say?
Nothing.
Requested Healy to work with Barnes to draft a recommendation to
solve these problems and to address these problems and to address:
the generic issue.