BNL 3372 Tis WIATOLCTY CF YONTTING RANIATICN B.P. 8.1 Cronkite, V.P. Bond, ond RA. Conard Scope and Status. The advent of the atomic cra has boson a great stimulus to research in the field of hematolecy. This dis quite undesstandable because changes in the blood and blood-forming organs, imperfect indices thoush they may be, still remain the moct sensitive biological evidences for excessive exposure to penetrating zonizine radiations. With this chapter will be considered the more comuon changes that are induced within blood and blood-forming organs by acute and chronic exposure to ionising radiations. Early Reports. early part of this century. These chanzcs nuove been studied extensively since the Despite this - 8.1.1. a diverse mass of data exists in tke describe and measure adequately the doszse of there are many conflicting reports. ey literature, arising prinarily from the inability of the carly investigators to onising radiation; accordingly, Mowover, the osiginal rcports of Meinecke, 1905-5, remain qualitatively corrects as docs the excellent report on blood chenges in paticnts undergoing therapeutic isradiation (Minot and Spurlinc). An excclient analytic review up to 1942 is that of Dumlan in Warsen’s general review. Since then there have been various generci dissertctioas on the relation of hematopoiesis to the effects of ionizing radiation (Lawrence, et al., and Osgood). 8.2 . In addition to the disccepancies ia dosage measurements, the differences in specics sensitivity and sesponse were not cyopreciated until a + Of P particular importance is the fact that many ? ’ investisators o au Ci on Cause of Discrepancies in Data. the last two decades. were notaware of tho differonce between the pictures produced by unifera tetalebody exposure, unequal” wee Aedes total-body exposure, and that produced by paortiaiebody exposure. Complete or

Select target paragraph3