aa"?
LYMPHOCYTES
Pd adi. tb. - dowd dd
MEAN COUNTS
NON EXPOSED
r
40
3.0
20
L
L
o.6UMUCU
fl
s
1
i
i
20840
50 60
AGE {¥R)
L
L
i
C080
7
T
T
T
rT
T
T
9
5 Sh
4 YEAR CONTROL 7
|
e
= 3OF
of
'
°
Rab.
wd
_
al
a
«
;
e
e
|
20+
e
«
s
4
|
4
.
sh
;
e
e
-
e
iol
i
@
Figure 10. Lymphocyte scattergram of individual counts
plocted against age; Rongelap, age >5, 4 years postexposure. Open circles represent mean counts of comparison population.
|
a
©
1
l
20
30
i
1
:
40
4GE
i
i
80
60
70
Figure 13. Platelet scattergram, males, of individual
counts plotted against age. Solid line represents values
for control population.
T
x 10-4
} MINIMUM
| counrs
O0aYS
31-89
60
UNEXPOSED
}
ale
iL
1
L
26636
44
86452
60
LYMPHOCYTES x 1072
1
68
CONTROL
L
76
4e.
4
20
YEAR
-
o 4 YEARS POST EXPOSURE 77
i2
4
|
|
te.
& RONGELAP
“T
PLATELETS
CUMULATIVE
PERCENT
100+ perion
80+
80
i
oO
Figure 11. Cumulative distribution curve, Rongelap
20
300
.
:
400
607
AGE
lymphocytes, age >5.
Figure 12. Mean platelet values for exposed Rongelap
people from exposure through + years post-exposure.
Stars represent mean values for control populauons.
—
mene)
| COUNTS
ao L(DAYS
S
60 |
9
201
|
/
o
af
id
PERCENT
TT
F PERIOO
ot
YR
r
in
DAYS
“MO
TIME AFTER EXPOSURE
i100
CUMULATIVE
PLATELETS x 10-4
\
pli. be
Figure 14. Platelet scattergram, females, of individual
counts plotted against age. Solid line represents values
for control population.
4
{| 4. RONGELAP UNEXPOSEO |
0-4 YEARS POST EXPOSURE
29
37.
4450—i“‘<Q&SRSCOCO!
PLATELETS x 107¢
Figure 15. Cumulative distribution curve,
Rongelap platelets, ail ages.
69