a en
etn eagle eee oa ante nell
ke
B.
Alternatives:
l.
2.
VIII.
ERDA supply list of scientists to Court and Court
appoints the Committee.
ERDA and Plaintiffsagree on a 5-man panel,
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSES OF FLORA AND FAUNA
Considered to be part of VII above.
IX.
CONTROL OF AGENCY SPENDING AND CONTRACTS
A.
Can't agree, and don't think plaintiffs' proposal is workable
in any event.
Propose that Government statement, or
stipulation of parties, be submitted which specifies the
commitments discussed above,
B.
C.
X.
While we don't think anything more is necessary, we would
be prepared to provide periodic status reports to the Court
on continuing developments.
Decision re EIS should be Interior decision.
Should action
on EIS be initiated, ERDA will assist DOI with this effort
as requested.
FURTHER MONITORING
A.
Can't agree to anything beyond what's stated in IX above.
Dus lalitnr
BEST AVAILABLE copy
Qvy A, Cumin her OGC.
DOE ARCHIVES
J.0. herman
M.8.~ Biles
an
tay
OFOS|
yw). Ww). Burr -
Or
T-
[.
We
~
>
Ful,Weg
dg.
L.
Mahar.
A&&
i. dean, AC
te
trig h
“(
oGe