emoale
“
'
+
te
aye x 2
Meetingte’Diacuss. pigposal"Methods.for naatologtéally Contaminated
and Non-contaminated Materials--_Enewetak AtollCleanup
2 wg’.
bes‘The ‘information’ Stained in thie‘noatingptovided-nobasis for
abandoning the disposal of radioactive conteminated material “in the Runit.
crater, ~ However, it did reinforce the ‘need* for @ studySy todetermine.the
bene geor
suitability of the crater from a geological‘Viewpoint. =! 500°" "
-
oo
. A change in-the method of disposal. to: ocean dumping wouldnot only
. increase the project cost for Case III by an estimated 10% but cause a delay
of from two to three years in disposal action while awaiting the grant of:
@ permit. Any stretch out of the project ‘work schedule after work has begun
would significantly add to project costae.
ET
.
5..
.
Recommendations._
one
Sota yee.
A
“Retain“the current. proposal, asitated in¢
the “DEIS of September 1974, to ‘dispose’of the radioactive debris resulting: from the cleanup (Case III) by
encapsulation in a concrete matrix Placed in the Runit craters and covered
with a concrete cap. <..
: Sta pe wo
ee.
a
:
¥
Epeaiiyhy
*
, «bas
“ALLEN A. ‘FUTRAL
.
. Chief, hogistics Services Division