!
us
Tabie 74.
1
'
ikini diet minu S Fandanus and breaadfruic.
1
Intake,
creivda
Mean cf areas
Area i
Suciide
50.
1975
-
73
i37.
2055
>
1375
Area 3
1980
ean
‘
1975
=
1380
4
52.5
“3,175
24,668
22,060
729,994
737
231
1750
1997-10667
4.58
3.3400
701920883303 4S
723,965 22,612
2.2,5 and <~
1980
=<.)
53.2
Table 27.
-i.8
1975
22.4
t
32.3
Area =
-3.3
739,240, 292
9
1980
Area |
F1L.4
-0.9
724,330
1054
7975
=n
2980
39.2
39.4
33,119
72.133
30,098
779
“182-1123
5.42
3.42
5.37
Eneu diet with coconut from Bikini.
Intake, 72Ci/da
Area 1
Nuclide
1975
1980
33
Area 2
1975
51.4
Area 3
1980
1975
42.8
$0.5
1980
41.9
1975
49.9
600,
41,8
13754
4,069 20,991 17,347 725,794 18,963 78,155 19,272
902,
401
739,240p, 1.74
604
698
1035-497
3.25
3.04
5.85
1.60
marrow, and liver of each radionuclide
Mean of areas
1,2,3 and 4
Area 4
1980
41.3
1975
48.4
1980
39.8
28,612 17,508 25,888
743
494
738
523
780
2.41
2.16
4.10
2.14
3.90
Focusing on the 30-vr integral dose
via the terrestrial food chain are
for the total diets from each island
listed in Table 28 for Eneu Island and
(Tables 28 and 29), it is clear that
Table 29 for Bikini Island.
13764 accounts for nearly ail of the
The
altered diets are listed in Table 30
whole body exposure.
and 31.
accounts for approximately 60% of the
Table 30 represents the
Cesuim-137
Bikini diet minus the Pandanus fruit
bone marrow dose, while 905, accounts
and breadfruit, and Table 31 reflects
for the remaining 40%.
£ 60
239,240
Contributions
the doses for the case in which the
oO
diet is from Eneu with the exception
trial food chain are relatively insig-
of coconut from Bikini.
The Bikini
Co and
nificant.
Pu via the terres~
Integral doses from 241s
data represent the average of areas 1,
would be similar to the predicted doses
2, 2, and = as previously described.
‘rom
-34-
239,240,
u.
The 30-vr integral