Commehts by Dr. Bugher 11/10/5h This excellent report will be ready for publication nearly as it is. The amount of editorial work required is small. Some minor comments: 1. P. 161 = There should be a little more specificity about the physical data. For example 0.3==3 uec. per fish at 120 days does not impress me as being Ad "very high levels of activity", particularly if the contamination were in the uneaten portions. This section could profit by a little addition: 2. Japanese fishermen. not properly a part examinations were a Suggest deletion of Japanese fishermen. This info is actually all hearsay and is of this report. Similarly the urine service to the Japanese by HASL. medical and analytical discussion of BRLTARY RESEARCH & APE, 9000964 \o