equipment, calibration procedures,

bias indicated that there was no

and GAMANAL are given in the Enewetak

significant. difference in the results

Radiological Survey report.

from the two facilities and that on

Most of the Bikini samples were

the average, for a series of samples,

packaged in 3.3- or 3.9-cm-high

both would obtain the same result.

aluminum cans with nominal volumes

Statistical variation does, of course,

of 95 and 210 cm, respectively.

exist in the measurement of any indi-

Isotopic activities are reported

vidual sample,

as disintegrations per minute per

the average value of many samples

gram (dpm/g).

is the important factor.

Eleven nuclides have

been observed in Bikini samples:
60 Co,

13

102
0 Teh,

106, 4,

1b

toe,

15 a

20755 235y, and

"os,

241

Am.

13354,

.
.
When these radionuclides were

but for dose assessment

In addition to the interfacility
comparison,

a series of samples ori-

ginally measured in the Biomedical
facility was resubmitted to the

not detected, upper limits were

facility at a later date for compari-

calculated by defining the upper limit

son of the analytical results.

The

photopeak area to be twice the square

data are presented in Table 3.

Again

root of the number of counts observed

there is no indication of any statis-

in the continuum normally occupied

tical bias in the data.

by the photopeak.

These comparisons reconfirm the

Thirty-one samples were submitted

reproductibility of results within

for comparative measurement to both

a facility and between facilities

the Biomedical and Radiochemistry

observed during the course of the

facilities.

The results are presented

analytical work for the 1972 Enewetak

in Table 2.

Testing the ratio for

survey.

Wet-Chemistry Analyses
amount of elemental carrier or

GENERAL

tracer,
Wet-chemistry analyses were

chemical separation and puri-

fication of the desired element,

required to quantify a number of

gravimetric or tracer yielding, and

nuclides

quantification by an appropriate

that could not be determined

by gamma spectrometry.

Briefly,

this

technique.

Table 4 presents a list of

procedure involves the dissolution of

the measured nuclides,

their half-

a sample in the presence of a known

lives, principal radiation, and

Select target paragraph3