). Histological study
ions showed it to be
“OVUS.
he skin of the Maracute “beta burns”
ne breakdown in the
.a€ Tadiation derma-
nt change. Only one
pecia ofthe occipital
n of epilation. Figure
i changes in a lesion
INATIONS
dogical data are prephs in the text, and
are presented in the
-y exposed Rongelap
-v of California Medical
gical interpretanons.
Table 18
Mean Levels of Rongelap Peripheral Blood Elements by Age and Sex, 1963
Plate.
WBC
(x10)
Males 9-15 s+
Rongelap exposed"
Ailingnae exposed
Utink exposed
Rongelap unexposed
Females 9-15 vr
P.ongeiap exposed’
Aulingnae exposed
Cink exposed
Roneelap unexposed
Males > 15-40 vr
Rongelap exposed
Adingnae cxposed
Ctink expored
Rongeiap unexposed
Females > 15-40 yr
Rongeiap exposed
Newt.
(xt0°)
Lymph.
(x10 ')
287 06 (9)
194
(th
419 9312}
286 78(14)
$.4722.18
6.64
9.20> 2.8B(
8.37 = 2.90;
(9)
(bt)
12)
t4)
3.921.351 (9)
2.79
(l}
4571-83011)
4.07 1.96( 14}
SOs 78 (8)
$.5072.49 (8)
4.42+3.09 (8)
402= Lisi t4)
3732 99( 17)
9.01 = 2.66( 15)
8.822-2.29(17)
4.81 = 2.04(15)
4.12 1.64( 16)
198 FIL)
_
32s 78(10)
24> 66(21)
6.582 1.49011)
—
6.55~ 1.47010)
TITS LA LT)
225
(2)
7.15
(2)
Mono.
(xl)
{xI0+)
3.25~0.59 (9)
3.19
qd)
3.891.57(C11)
3.27 1.2114)
0.44 (9)
0.06 (1)
0.24(11)
0.30( 14)
3.312-0.80 (8)
0.24 (8)
3.33 =0.94( 15}
3.862-0.77¢ 16)
0.29¢15)
0.26( 16)
3.27 20.74( 11)
—
3.420. 76(10)
4.07 + 1.86( 21)
2.82 ~-0.89( 11)
—
2.55 =0.85¢ 10)
2.96 £0.90( 21)
O.19(11)
_
0.27(10)
0,286(21)
3.69
(2)
297
(2)
0.22 (2)
2O7 = 12754)
8.02 + 2.18(14)
4.552 1.55( 14)
2.86 = 0.84( 14)
0.29( 14}
Ailingnae exposed
207
7 Ob
5.45
2.05
(4)
0.25 (4)
Uurik exposed
410% 97( 16)
7 172=1.39¢ 16)
3.96 1.45(16)
2.67 +0.66( 16)
0.21(16)
24> 66( 23)
7657-1 47(¢293)
4.23 1.34(23)
2.83 +0.78(23)
0.22( 23)
“las 87 (8)
345
(4)
$44 73019)
294 o6( 23)
6.337124 (8)
6.58
(4)
6 881 8519)
6.03 = 1.40( 23)
2.88+0.59 (8)
3.23
(4)
3.49 1.09/19)
3.17 0.99/23)
2.99> 1.04 (8)
2.46
(4)
2.80 +091¢(19)
1.85 +0.67( 23)
O.15 (8)
O27 (4)
0.22(19)
0.20¢ 23)
2587
249
402
HBr
98 (7)
47 15)
4016)
4419)
3822060 (7)
7 201.60 15)
7 OB 1 JOC 16)
721419)
2.86 20.58 +7)
3832-0.57 1.5)
347 et 1h15
$67 =) 20119)
2 56+063
2.37~1.20
307 =:0.92/
2.98 +0.94(
-
(7)
(5)
15)
19)
0.18 (7)
0.35 (5)
0.22(15)
0.26(19)
Of exposed parents
M4
95015)
10.60 = 3.497 16)
44925191 tO)
5 15 3.04( 16)
0.39; 16)
Of unexposed parents
P9119 PY)
10912 874 29)
44021 B2(0.29)
3.2921 BT, 29)
0.40( 29}
OF exposed parents
S862
87118)
12.201 92118)
4 767192(18)
hO7 +5000 18)
055(18)
OOF unexposed parents
$3—10bt 27)
10.15 22.30/ 227)
SRST 25122)
9.312 1.60( 22)
0 $6( 22)
Rongelap uneposed
Males ~+H) sr
Rongelap ¢x posed
Ailingnae exposed
Lunk exposed
Rongelap unexposed
Females >40.r
Rongelap exposed
Ailingnae cxpused
Curik expused
Roneelap unc .posed
Males <9 vr
{4)
(4)
{4)
Females < Gar
Eosin.
(m1 4
Males 4-'3 st
RBC
1x1
Het,”
Serum
protem. g
Hebd .g
Ronectap exposed*
O79 19)
O60 115
OO
O74 9p
Let 429445097
138505 9)
772505 (9)
Curik exposed
0.50011)
0 38(t1;
S79F2 112)
442 [F367 21
sO 7} S12)
7.620.43¢12)
Aulingnae exposed
Roneelap unex posed
Females 9-13 vr
are Po
Baso
tx id }
O69¢14)
«13
Gatel4y
SoU
ly
BFL ahs)
we
ida
434 z SG 14y
l24
(ld
LHD AOTC)
7.5
(1)
7820 4(12)
Roneeiap exposed’
048 (8)
046 193
393522.0 1B)
44924 18)
1359-09 (B)
80~6.4 (8)
Aulingnae exposed
O28 (2)
OO (21)
440
435
150
8.0
Cink exposed
0535015)
0 400151
3BO-21(15)
$27 = 9915}
1401 0¢15)
79204014)
Roneciap uncx posed
0.48616)
0.35/16)
3B.3227/17)
4242 40°17)
1S 724.6017)
7905/17)
(2)
(2)
t2)
{2}
41