TABLES 1,1 Energy Partition in Fission -----------+----+-------+----------+.--2- 10 1.2 2,1 2.2 2.3 Calculated Buildup Factors~--------------------------------. ee Exposure Ranges of the Emulsions- --~---------------------~------Quartz-Fiber Dosimeter Ranges -- --------------------+-+------.-. Station Layout and Utilization -------------------------------+---. 12 15 15 20 2.4 Station Construction -------------------------+---+-- +--+ ee 21 2.5 Film Sensitivity to Neutrons - ----------------------------------- 23 2.6 Initial-Gamma-Expcsure Correction Factors------------------------- 23 2.7 Residual-Gamma-Exposure Correction Factors ----------------------- 24 3.1 Shot Cherokee Data--~---------------------------------------+- 30 3.2 Shot Zuni Total Exposure - ---------------------------+--------- 30 3.3 Shot Zuni Initial-Gamma Exposure- - ------------------------------ 31 3.4 Shot Flathead Fox-Complex Instrumentation and Recovery ---------------- 31 3.5 Shot Flathead Initial Exposure- ---------------+-----------+--+----+--3.6 Shot Flathead Quartz-Fiber Exposure versus Time Device-------~-------3.7 Shot Flathead Residual Exposure -- ------+------------------------3.8 Shot Dakota Instrumentation and Recovery-----------------+---------3.9 Shot Dakota Initial Exposure - ----------------------------------3.10 Shot Navajo Instrumentation and Recovery - ----------------~-------3.11 Shot Navajo Initial-Gamma Exposure ----------------------------3.12 Shot Navajo Residual Exposure ------------------------------+-- 32 34 34 34 35 36 37 37 3.14 3.15 3.16 3.17 39 39 41 41 3.13 Shot Tewa Instrumentation and Recovery --------------------------- 38 Shot Tewa Residual Exposure ---------------+----+------+-+----+---+ Shot Tewa Initial-Gamma Exposure ------------+--+---+-+-+--++------Redwing Initial-Gamma Exposure- ------------------------------Yields and Relative Air Densities-----------------------.-------- FIGURES 1.1 Gamma exposurefor | kt surface burst- - --------------------------- 11 2.1 Co® calibration curves for film types- - ---------------------------- 16 2.2 Co? calibration curves for film types- - ---------------------------- 16 2.3 Co®® calibration curves for film types- ----------------------------- 17 2.4 Quartz fiber rate device with dosimeters ---------~----------------- 19 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 Quartz fiber rate device with dropping mechanism ---~----------------200 curie Co™® calibration curve ------~--------------------- eee Dupont 502 energy dependence curve normalized to Co™ value ------------Dupont 510 energy dependence curve normalized to Co® value ----~-------Dupont 606 energy dependence curve normalized to Co™ value ------------- 19 22 25 25 26 2.10 Quartz fiber dosimeter energy dependence curve normalized to Covalue------+----------+----------------- +--+ 26 2.11 AN/PDR-39 energy dependence curve normalized to Co® value------------ 27 3.1 Initial-gamma exposure versus time for quartz fiber rate device --~-------- 33 3.2 Initial-gamma exposure versus distance for Shots Cherokee and Zuni - ------------ <2 eee eee eee ee ee ee ee re eee 40 3.3 Initial-gamma exposure versus distance for Shots Flathead, Dakota, and Navajo-------------+-------- 22 - eee er tee ere 42 3.4 Initial-gamma exposure versus distance for Shots Navajo and Tewa---------- 42 3.5 Shot Zuni 76-hour residual exposure (roentgens) - --------------------- 43 3.6 Shot Flathead 72-hour residual exposure (roentgens) ------------------- 43 3.7 Shot Navajo 48-hour residual exposure (roentgens) - - -~-~----------------- 44 3.8 Shot Tewa 78-hour residual exposure (roentgens) 3.9 ---~------------------ 44 Comparison of data from Redwing and previous operations, DRYWversus R -~---------------- ee e e e e 8 eee e ee ee 45