TABLE 3.14 SHOT TEWA RESIDUAL EXPOSURE Station Number Exposure Quartz Fiber Position 66 r Film Position r 210.23 3.8 2.0 —_ rear 2.51 _ —_ _— 216.27 210.30 6.5 8.2 —_ _ 3.67 6.45 _ _— 210.34 _— rear 210.37 510 _ 391 _ 210.38 210.39 210.40 210.41 525 800 1,300 825 _ _ _ _— 454 627 1,045 755 _ _ _— _ 2,300 _ 2,833 front _ —_ —_ _ —_ —_ 1,916 3,016 2,400 right rear left 113.04 890 2,650 —_ _ rear _ 823 1,000 1,485 _ front right 113.07 113.08 1,460 rear 212.01 212.02 212.03 212.04 — 212.06 — rear ~~ _ 940 left 695 —_ 610 — 1,102 rear _ 920 580 front _ _— —_ —_ 860 762. rear left 510 _ 375 —_ _ 521 212.05 —_ 82.6 93.5 Stati ation 98 160 right _ 399 _ 1,027 rear 700 front _ _ _ — 668 640 rear left 240 —_— 201 _ _ _ 710 right Dist. “Stance ft Film Total Dose Chemicals r 15,850 14,380 14,380 * 160 250 400 250 250 _ 113.02 14,380 * 580 113.02 14,380 * 820 113.03 10,500 3,300 113.06 113.09 6,760 >7x10 2,875 5,940 >7x10f 7x 104 10,830 Initial r r r 113.01 113.02 113.02 113.05 Estimated Residual 160 to 250 250 400 _— _ —_ _ 580 — _ 820 2,500 250 2,650 800 800 Very great >7x 104 3.35 x 105 Destroyed Destroyed - Not Instrumented 1,950 6.5 « 10% 42,000 ¢ _ 250 800 —_ 3.35 x 108 1,150 * These films were located on the outside of the steel-pipe stations. other dosimeters were located inside the stations. All t Exposures anticipated at this station were far above the intended range of this dosimeter, and the instrument probably saturated. t As indicated in the text, this is probably in error. No explanation can be offered as to why this reading is lower than that of 113.04.