TABLE 3.14
SHOT TEWA RESIDUAL EXPOSURE
Station
Number
Exposure
Quartz Fiber
Position
66
r
Film
Position
r
210.23
3.8
2.0
—_
rear
2.51
_
—_
_—
216.27
210.30
6.5
8.2
—_
_
3.67
6.45
_
_—
210.34
_—
rear
210.37
510
_
391
_
210.38
210.39
210.40
210.41
525
800
1,300
825
_
_
_
_—
454
627
1,045
755
_
_
_—
_
2,300
_
2,833
front
_
—_
—_
_
—_
—_
1,916
3,016
2,400
right
rear
left
113.04
890
2,650
—_
_
rear
_
823
1,000
1,485
_
front
right
113.07
113.08
1,460
rear
212.01
212.02
212.03
212.04
—
212.06
—
rear
~~
_
940
left
695
—_
610
—
1,102
rear
_
920
580
front
_
_—
—_
—_
860
762.
rear
left
510
_
375
—_
_
521
212.05
—_
82.6
93.5
Stati
ation
98
160
right
_
399
_
1,027
rear
700
front
_
_
_
—
668
640
rear
left
240
—_—
201
_
_
_
710
right
Dist.
“Stance
ft
Film
Total Dose
Chemicals
r
15,850
14,380
14,380 *
160
250
400
250
250
_
113.02
14,380 *
580
113.02
14,380 *
820
113.03
10,500
3,300
113.06
113.09
6,760
>7x10
2,875
5,940
>7x10f
7x 104
10,830
Initial
r
r
r
113.01
113.02
113.02
113.05
Estimated
Residual
160 to 250
250
400
_—
_
—_
_
580
—
_
820
2,500
250
2,650
800
800
Very great
>7x 104
3.35 x 105
Destroyed
Destroyed - Not Instrumented
1,950
6.5 « 10%
42,000 ¢
_
250
800
—_
3.35 x 108
1,150
* These films were located on the outside of the steel-pipe stations.
other dosimeters were located inside the stations.
All
t Exposures anticipated at this station were far above the intended range
of this dosimeter, and the instrument probably saturated.
t As indicated in the text, this is probably in error. No explanation can
be offered as to why this reading is lower than that of 113.04.