Committee on Laboratory Infections

“arthropod-borne viruses,” are so named
because they are transmitted biologically by arthropods between vertebrate

and Accidents. We now report on the

extent of the problem of accidental infection, without regard to recommended
Measures or devices, since guidelines

hosts. Of more than 200 viruses now
classified as arboviruses, approximately
50 have been associated with disease

for laboratory safety and references to
specific procedures have been reported (3, 6).

in man, and many have caused overt
laboratory infections. This high inci-

Laboratory groups working with the

dence may have resulted from the
marked acceleration of studies of this

group of viruses and from the increase
in the number of persons who handle

fatal (Table 1). Information on 129
cases first became available through

arboviruses were asked to provide information concerning: (i) the number
quired

laboratory-ac-

the recent survey. Of the 192 arboviruses currently registered in a Catalog prepared by the American Com-

type, (ii) the circumstances that led
to infection, (ili) practices in labora-

mittee on Arthropod-borne Viruses (7),
36 are reported to have caused illness

acquired in the laboratory, and at least

and

these agents.
This article, based on data from
laboratories in 38 countries (4), reveals
risks for those who work with arboviruses. The information obtained was
related to the earlier records of the
American Public Health Association

tionnaire ranged from 29 with less
than five individuals employed to 13
with more than 15 persons on the
staff. Over half of the 91 laboratories
surveyed had five to 14 employees.
Of 428 overt laboratory-acquired infections due to arboviruses, 16 were

nature

of

arbovirus

overt

infections

by

virus

tories that may relate to detection and

prevention of infections, and (iv) the
number of people at risk.
Laboratories responding to the ques-

14 induced illnesses of such severity

that need for extreme precaution in
laboratory manipulation was indicated

(6). Most of the arboviruses known
to have caused Jaboratory-acquired in-

fections are in group B. The data do
Table 1. Overt laboratory-acquired infections with arboviruses. APHA/CLIA, American
Public Health Association, Laboratory Section/Committee on Laboratory Infections and
Accidents. ACAV/SLI, American Committee on Arthropod-borne Viruses/Subcommittee on
Laboratory Infections. Numbers in parentheses represent cases for which information first
became available through recent ACAV questionnaire.
Arboviruses

Information from
APHA/CLIA

Chikungunya
,
Eastern equine encephalitis
Mayaro
Mucambo
Venezuelan equine encephalitis
Western equine encephalitis

Group A
13
2
1
2
92
5

Dengue
Japanese B encephalitis
Kunjin
Kyasanur Forest disease
Louping-ill
Omsk hemorrhagic fever

Group B
4
1
2
9
19
2

U.S. bat (Rio Bravo)
St. Louis encephalitis
Spondweni
Tick-borne encephalitis
Wesselsbron
West Nile
Yellow fever
Zika

5
1
2
8
2
3
37
1

Powassan

Apeu

Marituba

1

Group C
1

Oriboca

Bunyamwera
Germiston
Oropouche
Junin
Machupo
Vesticular stomatitis

Colorado tick fever
Nairobi sheep disease
Piry

Rift Valley fever
18 AR 1742 (unidentified)
AR 1792 (unidentified)
1284

ACAV/SLI
13

(6)

3 (2)
2
46 (26)

4 (2)
1
1
60 (56)
3 (2)
1 (¢5)
1

5
13 (10)
2 (2)
11 (8)
1 (1)

1

i

1

(1)

@)

Bunyamwera

4
3
Simbu

Tacaribe
2
1

7
1
1

28
1

19
2
3
2
118
5

Deaths

1
2

- sified (for administrative purposes) according to their various propensities for

2
8

1

3.
1

(3)

5
1

(1)

3

(3)

I
I

1
1

(1)
(1)

8
1
4

29
1
1

causing laboratory infections. Many
caused overt disease of such severity

that hospitalization for periods of 2
days to 3 months was required; seven
different viruses caused death. Although Kyasanur Forest disease virus
has not been reported to be fatal for
any laboratory personnel, it is highly
infectious. Clinically apparent infections occurred in 65 laboratory workers, principally in India, New York,
and Washington.
In several instances, an arbovirus
was first found to be capable of producing disease in man as a result of
infection of laboratory personnel. Six

persons with laboratory-acquired dis-

38

6

Seven cases

laboratory (/7). The viruses causing
these infections may eventually be clas-

1

2

(9).

and all the infections from Colorado
tick-fever virus occurred in a single

1

(2)

in two laboratories

of vesicular stomatitus virus infection

were reported by one institution (J0),

1

2

dom used, and others are used in
many laboratories. For example, 24
cases of Venezuelan equine encephalitis

were the result of a single accident

6
1
2
65
21
3
5
1
2
18
4
il
38
1

single laboratory, some viruses are sel-

(8), and most of the cases. of Kyasanur
Forest disease virus infection occurred

4
3

Vesicular stomatitis virus
38
1
Ungrouped

Total

not necessarily reflect the risk of infection from each of the viruses listed because some cases tend to be concentrated in a single area or even in a

ease due to louping-ill virus were the

1

only known human cases until two
instances of naturally acquired disease
”
were reported in 1948 (/2), and. tha
first recorded case of Zika virusinféction in man was a labaratory-acquired
SCIENCE

Unt

1s

Select target paragraph3