to Effects of ionizing radiation Number + tion Of vienicnis of the rachum and thorium scri¢s, Of potassium-10 and of carbon-i+, pro- my tis san IMMOwer 663 ve r GuPring is tacking. In 1959, Brues®* commented that the subject of effecis of low-level irradiation concerned “hazards which, Hf they exist, cannot possibly be demonstrated to exist because they are relatively so small.” Upton,?* in re- i a ec = oO “x ry oO ue oO & G2 leukemia for white children in wie United we Co vi78 The radiauon exposure from radioisotopes in peciatric patients for a numberof diagnostic tests has also been calculated.™ Adequate inrormation on effects of low doses in both man and experimental animals “might be of the order of 30 10 100 mrem.’ po 3 $2 y oo m4 a) Is vides radiation exposure frominternal sources in dose rates estimaied to be 126 mrem1 year to the gonads, 130 mrem per vear to the cells lining bone surfaces, and 122 m year to the hematonoictic tissues. Medical diagnostic radiology constitutes another source of inevitavie low-level irradiation, the magnitude of which has been the subject of recent inquiry.2% ° “ The annual genetically significant dose received by an individual in the Uniied States from diagnostic roentgenologic procedures has been estimaica to be 356 = 25 mrem minimumand 140 + 100 mrem probabie.*® Alinough estimates ot bone marrow dose are bascc on sparse data and assumptions, the UNSCEAK in two reports has suggested that the catiimate oO: the populauon per capita cose 5ra Ss go Ee eo a i wo th 3 f, o Bas Volume 67 MacMahon* has reported the results 3 chilcren born in and discharged alive from 37 large maternity hosnitals in the northeastern part-of uc United States from 1947 through 1954. For each of three categories, ieukemia,“ys neoplasms of the central nervous system, and other neoplasms, he cancer rate was found to be “abour 40 percent Righer in the N-rayed than in the unX-raved members of ihe stucy population. The excess cancer moriihy in the N-cayed @rOuD WS MOst wiarkec at aves S through 7 years, at which ume ie relative risk was 2.0. The excess risk apparenUy was exhaustea by age 8." MacMsiuon mus este mated that the probablhy of death from: - Siates up to the age of 10 years wil be increased from 46 per 100,000 chiidren to 62 per 160,000 children by prenatal irradiauion.** In a prospective approach.* 43,742 women who between 1975 and i956 received pelvic irradiation qurh.. pregnancy were Idenufed from the records of selec: Viewing raciation carcinogenesis, stated that hospitals (Edinburgh and London’ snc tne subsequent deaths from leukemia of the chi “onisting aia... are not ac equate tO Der- dren of these pregnancies were then Invest- mit conficent 1 estanation of the risks of small increases in pacxground radiation.” Sowane effects. The report by Srewar anc asscciaces’” that dlagnostic pelvic irraGiatlon of tie pregnant mother was associatec With subsequent development of leukemia and others malignant neoplasms in the child WAG Was exposed in uiero triggered a numye ber Of shuilar epideniologic studies Ta subsequent communications, the original conclusions were confirmed and amplined? The stucy attempred to trace all children in England and Wales who had died of lecuxemia (792 cases) or other cancer (02 ases} before the tenth birthday during 1953-1955. It was concluded that the risk of subsequent malignant changes in the chid eaied. Court-Brown, Doll, and Hin.? in ihis study, founc 9 instances o7 leukemia among 39,165 liveborn children when 10.3 was the estimated expected number. The study abo : there was no evidence of any proportionate occurrence of leuxaemia among the children who had been most heavily irradiated nor among tne children who had been irradiated early in intrauterine wie.’ Data nor in accord with those of Stewart and of MacMahon have woo been reported from several other studies. 2? Although the exposure dose cannot ve preciscly determined in these suidies,' the reporied association between prenata: pelvic irradiation at diagnostic dose levels and intN creased Icukemogenesis and carcinogenesis}

Select target paragraph3