409802 UNITED STATES ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20545 March 31, 1975 Tommy McCraw, OS Nat Barr, DBER Bill Forster, DBER Sid Marks, DBER COMMENTS IN RESPONSE TO MITCHELL'S LETTER AND MARTELL'S APPENDIX Enclosed are the comments I have prepared in response to Mitchell's letter and Martell's appendix. These were assembled from your input, as well as from other sources. In reply to Geesaman's appendix I plan to use our response from the LMFBR PFEIS; similarly I plan to include WASH-1320, LA-5810 and the British MRC report in response to the NRDC comments. Since DNA needs this material by Wednesday, April 2, and since it must be revised according to your comments, would it be possible for you to review this immediately and return your comments by COB Tuesday, April 1? My apologies for the short time frame, but my lead time, especially with lab replies, wasn't much longer. Please review for accuracy, completeness, responsiveness, etc. If you feel the response is unnecessarily thorough, please discuss, a Ay L% ce liMWalkhety, £ Bruce W. Wachholz, Ph.D. ~ Biomedical Programs Division of Biomedical and Environmental Research , Enclosure: As stated ° DOCUMENT DOES NOT CONTAIN ECI Reviewed weOPAAB.pate ELL) REPOSITORY PNNL . COLLECTION Marsha |] BOX No. FOLDER Lslands IGES5 we Free Joye.» P44 Phy;