This is your 107 ealcium, Yao? that's right. Then we have used essentially the same numbers and with these numbers what I get is that 4 mg/eq, mile — I'm not sure if that's the nusber you want. b milligrass of ar” per square mile will give you in equilibrium of 1 microcurie in the bones of an adult perace. That's in 20 years growth? In equilibriva May I ask you how that eomes cut to 270 mleregraus per acre? Are they coaparable figures? Yours is higher, K*m sorry to say: This is 150 wllligrems per aquare mile, I think, is what you said. Thatts right. Now suppose I state uy assumption in detail. You have kilogram of calcium in the bone and 1 wicrocurie of Sr”, uhioh ts Sx10™ miorograns, therefore this is 5x10 of the exount of ealeius. First of all you are coming to a falacious conelusion in this kind of reasoning. You are going to finally state that the amount of strontium deposited 1s related to the amount ef calcium, and that ie only true up to the point of vertain optimal calcium intakes and beyond that it doestt hold. In other words if you start out See TD ___—_=—=“u DUE ARCHIVES o, ue i> 220 grows.