range of your rain or above it, that would be some weful information, But I don't think you're ever really going te gat, to we your words, a three-dimensionsl picture of the aloud in all its fine structure. I think that's just beyond our present network's capability. CGORS : If you had such a picture, you still wouldn't be able te apply it, because then really what you need wuld he fine scale structure of rain, which, well maybe it exists free enall rain networks, but WEXLER: . Wall, radar could give that te you. Then I don't know what you'd do with it if you did have it, even then. What, really, would you do with 1t7 Maybe I'm putting words im your mouth, bat did you have semesthing in aind of comparing the distribu- tion initially in some coliemi with the distribution finally -~ after a certain tins interval — te see thes wiat might be the vertical motions? Yes, but then if that vere the case, how do you — that's the same colum you are dealing with 1f there is all sorts of shearing actions that take a percel from one colum to a different. colwmn RELLOGG: I don't mean to imply that it would be an easy analysis, but it would be a very difficult one -—— exceedingly ocmplicated. We do know wiich directions the winds went. If we have a radio- sonde network, we know where the debris was initially from observations at the teat BXZE site. We oan put these together DOE ARCHIVES