aeBEY
(continued)
through into the weather layers.
If that's true, it wuld
be shorter; and ae, if you contime to make these observations,
you're going to continus cver years to see radioactivity ocue
out in a were oy less uniform fashion all over the wrld.
WEXLER:
Now let me ask this, Dr. Libby.
Is it possible far the stuff
once it's been deposited on the ground to gat evept uw to the
atmosphere again?
LIBBY:
I should think not.
VOICE:
Why not?
LIBBY:
Row could it?
TGks
LIBET:
Attached tc windblew dust, or something.
Oh, but isn't that very mincr as compared to — I mean, the
chance of a given dust particle being pioked uw and put back into
the air is wery minor indeed and I fmagine...
WEXLER:
T don't know, we have terrific dust storms, as you imov, in
certain areas in the world.
PLESSETs
.
I think 4t aleo ecmes back to the question of the ebservation
Ben Holsman made between what's way watairs and what's intermediate.
Is there a contimal mizing at all layers — those
that are closer nix mcre and those that are farther apart nix
less?
Can you really sharply distinguish between what's
wesetairs and what's intermediate’
qn
DUE ARCHIVES