iii
7 MON
This discussion seens to me to indicate that the pilot query
which we have up there is only part of the question and the
other pilot qery which we had was what is the distribution of
radioactivity for Strontium 90 in the werld today?
they are two quite different problems.
I think that
To determine as human
hazard requires one set of measurements, whereas to determine
its distribution in the world which is integrated into the human
haserd requires a different set of measurements.
You wouldn't
need to make any stratospheric measurements to determine the
human hasard as long as you had fallout.
LIBEY:
I think, on the contrary, that you probably would.
In order to
back up finding the radioactive Negroes in South Africa.
You
find a radioactive person ir Seuth Africa and say hew in the world.
Maybe he tock a trip or maybe he ate Alaskan canned salmon, and
you becin to investigate and find that the rain is radicactive
with Strontium.
SOLOMONs
But the fallout takes account of a great deal of this.
In other
worda, one is operstional and the other 4s science.
BILL:
There is another inportant thing.
Lf you analyse, say in your
pilet atud7, over a period of months you find that a certain
axount of stuff is biological material.
You are still faced
with the problem of what is going to happen in the future and
until you arrive at something about diatribution in the lithohydresphere
sphere and/ap well, I doen't see how you are going to extrapolate
with any competence.
ne
DUE ARCHIVES