34
Table 17

Sr* Analyses of Rongelap Urine Samples
Subject
No.

Age

Sex

7
14

44
33

M
F

16

47

M

19

13

15

18

20

15

29
15

F

F

M

M

2

25

F

23
24

12
21

M
F

27

36

34

M

39

23

16

M

40

37

M

41

$2

F

M

50

42

838

29

M

843
865

33
29

F
F

885
893

22
44

59
69
818
822

895
896

42
i2
J1
16

32
22

~

M

F
F
M
M

Other

—‘Identi-

fication
pool

24-hr
24-hr

24-hr

24-hr

24-hr

24-hr

Sr™,
dis/min

Sample

pertotal
sample

pc/l

Sr,

Ca,
g/l

pC/g Ca

12,360

216.2%4.9°

7.90.2

0.018

43911

7.30.9

0.014

521+64

0.131

100+ 6

vol., ml
1,280
1,400

1,760

1,000

1,060

1,540

24.7+1.6
51.0+1.9

8.7+0.6
16.4+0.6

23.7+0.8

10.7+0.4

28.6+1.6
30.8+2.0

20.7+1.6

13.1%0.8

214+18

10.5+1.1

0.082

12813

47.422.1

10.4+0.4

2nd 24-hr
24-hr
24-hr

980
1,180
890

21.9%1,7
30.341.9
46.7+1.2

10.1+0.8
11.6+0.7
23.6+0.6

24-hr

1,250

46.0+1.8

24-hr

800

24-hr
2nd 24-hr
24-hr
2nd 24-hr
24-hr
2nd 24-hr

24-hr

1,360
2,020

600
710
1,960
1,180

880

15.84%1.7

17.4+1.5
21.4+1.8

5.80.5
4.80.4

16,6+0.6

§2.4+2.0

15.7+0.6

0.152

M
F

2nd 24-hr
24-hr
24-hr
2nd 24-hr
24-hr
24-hr

1,860
740
610
450
1,730
1,580

31.2%2.5
46.0%2.5
14.3+0.8
8.4+1.2
31.741.6
20.9+2.0

7.6+0.6
28,0+1.5
10.1+0.6
8.41.2
8.2+0.4
6.0+0.6

F

2nd 24-hr
24-hr

1,240
1,000

9.31.2
16.6+1.5

3.4+0.4
7.50.7

24-hr

260

216% 8

0.268”

15.641.3
$4.0+1.9
105.4%2.5
18.0+1.5

F

0.077

0.120
0.125

46.6+1.5

1,100
2,040
1,660
2,000

1,500)

148+12
{53+ 9
193+ §

91.142.9

13.421.1

4.8+0.9

6.4+0.5
11.9+0.4
28.6+0.7
4.020.3

8.3+1.6

200+ §

0.068
0.076
0.122

26.1+0.8
20.9+1.1
10.0+0.4
10.0+0.4

24-hr
24-hr
24-hr
24-hr

24-hr

0.052

34.8+1.0
32.9% 1.7
43.34+1.8
26.32+1.2
23.922.0

Sl+ 2

0,028

2,060

680

0.209

49 3
273210

6.0+0.5

24-hr

24-hr

0.178
0.060

Sr,

0.131
0.090
0.123
0.155
0.312

48+ 4
38 3

199+ 6
232212
8is 3
64+ 3

43424

174% 6

0.149
0.036
0.140
0.104

43x 3
330211
204+ 5
38+ 3

0.142
0.390
0.051
0.031
0.119
0.067

S54z 4
722.4
19812
271439
69+ 3
90+ 9

0.037
0.045

92-11
167+16

0.077.

:03+ 4

108+21

*The error term accompanyi. g each result is the Poisson error of counting.

ashore in Rongelap Village enhanced the rapport
with the people, possibly by allaying any fears that

they might have had concerning lingering radio
activity on the Island.

A review of the medical status of the people
during the past year revealed that they had generally been in good health with the usual number of

minor ailments, and that no disease epidemics had.
occurred. Some cases of sickness from eating im-

properly prepared arrowroot flour and poisonous

fish were reported. One death occurred in a 78 yr.
old woman in the exposed group who was quite
senile; death resulted from a fall. Autopsy and histological studies showed advanced senile changes,
but there was no reason to relate radiation exposure to such findings in a woman of this age. Four
normal births had occured in the exposed group
and four in the comparison group. No miscarriaves or stilibirths were reported during the past
year.

Select target paragraph3