7 J TT “| 10.0 -- — 4 -“” + yg x Vey oy a L * “ w pre-e aw on ~~ *. * ‘ NEUTROPHILS 4 ’® re rN 4 » | | L 4 Oo & 24 40 DAYS 56 7 6 | 2 3 4 5 MO YEARS TIME AFTER EXPOSURE -3 LEUKOCYTES LL 6 ! 10 oO ! 20 j 30 1 J} 40 50 60 70 AGE (YR) years post exposure. Stars represent mean values of comparison population. @ 0 T TT mT T ———T T T fF | 80 L 930 Figure 34. Neutrophil counts of exposed Rongelap individuals plotted against age at 5 years post exposure, 1959. Solid line represents meanlevel ofcomparison population. 4 a a 8.0b L ts wo 7.0r ° 1 n 7 $ . oO 6.0F og *~ bd n 80F = 8 Mh LYMPHOCYTES x 107° TTS WO Figure 33. Mean neutrophil and white blood cell counts of exposed Rongelap people from exposure through 6 Ke tt oOo & 24 1 1 40 DAYS } 4 56 1 JA 72 Al & & 40r i | 2 MO 3 4 5 6 x YEARS oT 100 qT J } PERIOD MINIMUM COUNTS (DAYS 31-59) ch aoe 7% 20 Po] oO A 1 TS a 4 :. UNEXPOSED 0 = e ° ‘ * e e ee* jot 10 20 7 e ~ e Lor Figure 35. Mean lymphocyte values of exposed Rongelap people from exposure through 6 years post exposure. Stars represent mean values of comparison population. | . 8 = TIME AFTER EXPOSURE CUMULATIVE PERCENT TTT NEUTROPHILS x iO . 6 ph LEUKOCYTES AND NEUTROPHILS x 107? 12.0 * 4 “ e tt ot 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 AGE (YR) Figure 36. Lymphocyte counts of exposed individuals plotted against age at 5 years post exposure, 1959. Solid line represents mean counts of comparison population. BO 60 40 7. 4 RONGELAP UNEXPOSED O 5 YRS POST EXPOSURE 20 o4 A| 20 jo | , 28 36 44 52 #60 LYMPHOCYTES x107? L 68 l 76 Figure 37, Cumulative distribution curve, Rongelap lymphocytes, 1959. 2 Qo “ mat LJ " an ee &—"" aw a », eee - a _ MALES (AGE >10) ut t10b = a oli 08 he 24 i 40 DAYS 1d 56 A 72 6 It _—_L 2 1 3 MO YEARS TIME AFTER EXPOSURE 1 4 1 5 Figure 38. Mean platelet values of exposed Rongelap . people from exposure through 5 years post exposure. Stars represent mean values of comparison population.