28
those >>35, exposed and unexposed, werefree of

clinically detectable peridontal disease. In the
aged, many of the remaining teeth were simply
held in position by the gingival attachment.
Almost all the Rongelapese exhibited marked
xerostomia. The oral mucosa felt damp butnot
wet. During the dental examination, manipulation of the tissues by mouth mirror and explorer
failed to stimulate the flow of saliva. For pH readings, the paper strip had to remain in contact with

the floor of the mouth for 25 to 30 sec in orderto
absorb sufficient saliva. In most instances it was
difficult for the subject to produce the 5 mlof
saliva necessary for pH determination in a period
<(10 to 15 min. The fH values ranged from 6.0 to
7.5, with an average of 6.3
Utirik Population

The Utirik population exhibited oral findings
similar to those of the Rongelapese. Their standards of oral hygiene were somewhatsuperior, but
the incidence of peridontal disease and caries in
adults was practically identical. In the Utirik
children less evidence was seen of bunchingofthe
lower anterior teeth, and jaw developmentwasin
harmony with general body growth.
Conclusions

These examinations led to the following con-

clusions.
1. There was no significant difference in either
caries rate or incidence of peridontal disease between the exposed and the unexposed people of
Rongelap. Thelevel of oral hygiene appeared to

be somewhatbetter in the children examined at
Majuro and at Utirik, but the incidenceofcaries

wasaboutthe samein the two groups, and higher
than in the Rongelapese children.
2. The poor oral hygiene generally observed in
the Marshallese people had its usual results: a
high caries rate in teen-age children; severe peridontallesions in adults (heavy calculus, loss ofalve-

olar bone); and edentulous mouthsin the aged.
_ 3. No difference was perceptible in the clinical
appearanceof developing dentition amongtheexposed children, the nonexposed, and those born to
irradiated parents.
STUDIES OF AGING CRITERIA

The results of aging criteria studies are plotted
in Figures 13 to 31. Individual readings are plotted

Foe
roy

mms
=
CONT

eu

Fl uo

(open circles, exposed people; closed circles, unexposed people) to show the spread of the data, and

the mean valuesare also plotted (squares) for each

5-year age group with exposed and unexposed
people combined. Thetrend of each criterion with
increasing age is representedby a line of approxi-

mate best fit by eye. The values of the criteria

generally either increase or decrease with increas-

ing age. Many changes, such as greving of the

hair, balding, arteriosclerosis (peripheral and
retinal), and skin looseness and retraction, are not
appeciably manifest in the Marshallese until after
age 35 to 40. There is a tendency for values of
criteria such as blood pressures, greying of the
hair, loss of visual acuity, and accommodation to
level off, or even to show slightly reduced values
in the oldest groups. The numberof people in
these groups is too smal! to make this observation
certain. However, American statistics on blood

pressure (systolic and diastolic) also show a plateau
effect beyond about 60 years of age and evena
slight tendency to lowering of blood pressures be-

yond this age.*® By the age of 65 to 70, arcus
senilis in all Marshallese showed a 4+ change
and, therefore, the plateau was at a maximum.

Some curves showed lower maxima. For example,
baldness in women showedonly a 35% maximum,
and arteriosclerosis of the retina only 45%, The
differences in maxima probably were due largely
to differences inthe degree of change associated
with the various criteria but also partly to the
arbitrary nature of the scoring. The sexualdifferences in hand strength and baldness were expected. In the neuromuscular functiontest, slight
muscle fatigue may have been a factor in the lower
female scores, necessitating separate evaluation.
ee)

Tod

100

TT

re

so ae

|

I

~

o= EXPOSED
«= UNEXPOSED
°=MEAN BOTH GROUPS

ete

|

I9g

90

80}
70

67s

~, 00

(sec)

50

45

40}
30
=|

io!
20

225

.
30

.
40

50
60
AGE-YRS

7O

80

Figure 13. Skin retraction time, 1958-1959.

Select target paragraph3