Should the decision be to not entomb soil in the soil-cement mix, the probler of disposal of contaminated debris remains. in the crater? crater? Can we put the debris, unconfined, Must we make enough soil~cement mix to cover debris in the Is there some other alternative for debris disposal, such as bury onRunit? e. Radiological feasibility of residence on the Aomon(Sally)-Bijire(Tilda)—- Lojwa(Ursula) Complex and Dri-Enjebi desires pertaining thereto. This is primarily a TTPI/DOE decision but is of interest in how it may impact the cleanup project. Will there be less cleanup work or more cleanup work involved in making the complex suitable for habitation? Do bunkers and slabs, now planned to remain in place, have to be removed? If additional work required greatly exceeds that now programmed, there will have to be a resource trade-off. f. Disposal of brush cleared in preparation for soil removal. contaminated soil will inevitably be along with brush. contain uptake of contaminants, fission products. The brush may Burning the brush may result in "hot spots" of contamination in the ash~soil mixture. been promulgated to windrow brush for burning. Some Guidance has After burning the ash area is to be surveyed and any transuranic contamination levels exceeding the level for that island to be excised. concentrations would also be excised. Any "hot spots" of fission product This guidance has the effect of denying most of the soil nutrient value of the brush. to simply allow the brush to decay. It might be better Or it may be more desirable to move the brush to Runit and bury or allow to decay there. The guidance needs to be re-evaluated. 305,