5. The elimination from the Task Group of a J=2 Section which represented the AEC has made it impossible for the Task‘Group to confirm the security clearance status of its own people. This situation has occasionally resulted in embarrassment or delay of official visiters, etc., since direct commnications between | 1 " . this headquarters “and & requestor of security information could not be used, For futureoperation, at is recounended that a AEG Security Branch’exployee be attached to 10 7.1 Headquarters . to handle confirmation of clearances, - 6. The errival of military personnel who have notret been grantedan AEC Q Clearancehas, been a problem,as at!was during i cateof IvY. Hq:oF has “subdeeded,in arrangingwithWaskington Area'! ae erat) . » Security ‘Operations’sid the‘military services‘to facilitatepee the handling of Q Clearances |‘and overall’ experiences thus tes oe reel “at pave shoim’ an‘tnproveaentover IVY. However, in severalinstances; Sere Ny ReBS | persciinel.havearrived’herewithout Q‘Cheetinces.Tha omuses ae ce vee, Rebs ce "oe! | a miltiple Froblea.in (faat‘te"aubjectceaaseune“the dutiesa, é ge ‘- \t ~# for isto, he was.‘assigned toieorem, he matPena 4idle aMe oe 2 mt eleareas’‘be cannotbe’asigned housing.(normally) at.oo " ‘Les Aimos,“ana mst beteaporerity ressiigied to a militery N ‘ £ unit at Sandia Base atidgieared, then brought back when . § ; cleared, au tate oniéedot only unjustifiable expense ta x 4 the government, but enbarrassing incidents when prospective © Q y employing offices see the JTF send a man who is not permitted to go to work because security requirements have not been , satisfied, This has occasioned much time-consuming and costly commmication, usually not effective. eee ae It is of "