-1&- Reach was sampled only twice, at the first ° end the last of the ; \. ) experimental period (Pig. 5). = These =. . N\ me . ‘ than for island : soil, end & somewhat lower decline . NO mS eparese deta suggest @ considerebly low- . er initial level im zn . ! ° ; ri ‘. . ee ee Le . ! ena rate of -0.7. vue Pigure 8 shows deach sand declines for eight islands, and pre-Nectar lev- As with island soil there was great variability, possibly because of the continual shifting of the sand. The ° . pone ‘Seram wavs. eee northern islands vere = els except at Elmer. “ Pig. 8 only slightly more radioactive than the southern islands, but the declines at the southern islands, especially Henry and Leroy, tended to be steeper than at the northern islands. The slower decline at northern than at southern islands 1s probably caused by & greater residue cf radioactivity from previous detonations (higher pre-Nectar levels) at northern localities, possibly associated with the water currents. ead wee The decays for beach sand are given in Table 4, page 13. Except for Henry (Fig. 5), these are based upon only tvo points. Beach sand decays were appreciably ateeper at the southern than at the northern islands. The relationship between the slopes of declines and decays was inconsistent. At Henry decline slightly exceeded decay. At Leroy decays vere steeper than declines, and at other localities differences were negligible. In generel, decays vere steeper than declines, although not convincingly so. tt wa nee e- Tetertieas peach send at Belle

Select target paragraph3