83 ‘ one big chore to go out at regular intervals. no hazard to expect under 20 years, If there is I think we ouwwht to seriously start thinking about these followup trips. Is it even necessary to go back four times in this coming year? Being one of the individuals involved, have 2 personal bias in it. perhaps I But just as we are talking here from the standpoint of prognosis, nobody yet has come up with anything that means anything to me, ought to watch Alderson Reporting Company Washington, D. C. I think what we have been talking about 11 in these last two discussions are something that would only 12 happen in 15 or 20 years. 13 planning as you have for the immediate followups. 14 my understanding, 15 philosophy behind the coming followups was to follow the 16 blood count back to normal, to find out whether it is 17 back to normal, say, next August or fall. 18 complete the study of 19° if you can develop a reasonable rapport with the trust territory physician, 21 lot of expeditions. CDR. 23 of the long 24 I have not been as close tothe But it is or at least I would think that the 20 20 ARC them. DR. DUNHAM: 10 except that somebody the acute phase, In other words, and then after that, there should not have to be an awful CRONKITE: I was thinking not only in terms term prognosis, but the prognosis for the immediate future, because someone is committed to making a trip in August, and again a few months thereafter, in order a? rey RY