a2 to be quite cautious. One other point. You mentioned that since this is pretty close to tolerance that we don't think it is too important. I think we have to be very careful. While we may be close to tolerance or a little over, we have a complex situation in wich we have not only the internal dose of all these separate emitters added up to close to tolerance, but which have what we think was close to a tolerance external Alderson Reporting Company Washington, D. C. dose. I think the effects are more than just. additive. 10 Certainly it does not affect the acute situation. 11 individual studies on individuals separately for many days. 12 We tried to correlate our excretion in the nrine with various 18 levels of blood picture curves, 14 cells, 15 and I think we all agree on this, the internal body burden is 16 roughly proportional to the external dose that was calculated 17 for each group. the platelets, and white and we could not find any correlation. 18 We did The Rongelap are the highest. In general, The Iligina have 19 received half the external, 20 Their mean excretion is pretty close to a half of the Rongela 21 The American group -- I am not sure what the external dose is 22 and they are pretty close. now -— the internal dose is pretty close to a fourth of the 23 Rongelap. ARC 24 I think we agree on that now. MR. HARRIS: 25 : This shows a little less than a third and assuming all errors I would assign a sigma of about two t vb t eegy D an artrant . an ' “* zh Saasy eta to to . wy ettsory ™ oho $3