29 This is borne out by the fact that in general where clothing 2 covered the body, 8 women, burns did not appear. 4 logically by the fact that there are islands of norman tissue 5 in between the several affected tissue, indicating the s oO OpO| particular nature of the deposited material, and the fact 7 that it was deposited material that was responsible for the 8 burn. don't know how to explain this. 11 discrepancy or difficulty explaining the order of appearance 12 of lesions. Saal 14 = 3 < One thing that is not clearly worked out, and I. 10 ff Bf a) It ig also borne out histo- 6 9 Pe even a light dress in. the case of the radiation, Generally speaking, the Apparently there is some the lower the dose,of: beta later the lesions would appear. This in general was not entirely the case with he 15 these individuals. 16 severe beta lesions. 17 the anterior surface af the neck, showed beta lesions. 18 The scalp and the feet where the skin presumably is thicker 19 sometimes lesions appeared later, 20 in the case of the areas with thinner skin. 21 22 ARC 23 24 25 oe Denarrr Histcrity’s bo ARCHY. 2% The feet, for instance, showed very The surface of the anacubicle foci, and were more severe than Also the order af appearance of these lesions in general was different from some reports in the literature. Also this was apparently a monophasic response as we got a single appearance On approximately the 14th day. was no evidence of erythema or other skin damage, There This