25 4 might be put in terms of a higher figure, differing by about 3 this much. I am not prepared to say anything more than this right now. I do believe the point should be made that the figure, say, of150 does not necéssarily imply the same biological effect as 150 r divided equally between both sides 6 of ap experimental animal. 7 consideration. 8 : 9} Alderson Reporting Company Washington, D. C. 10 Are we not talking abdut roentgens at least 5 centimeters in here when you speak of the whole bay dose of 150 rather than superficial area? 11 MR. HARRIS: 12 DR. SONDHAUS: It is air dose. We have taken the readings of_an 13 instrument in air and integrated with them. 14 specifying here 15 exposed. 16 17 DR. BUGHER: 19 DR. BOND: 22 23 24 Department f Foy Histories ~ ty ARS. J.20 You are not calling it as a whole body exposure, DR. a So what we are is an air dose to which an individual was 18 20 ARC DR. BUGHER: This should be taken into dose. SONDHAUS: That is right. It is usually expressed as a whole body It is a dose in the air given to the whole body. DR. BUGHER: Has the committee any estimate of dose at 5 centimeters or 10 centimeters or any figure? DR. BOND: been completed. It is under investigation, but it has not It is being worked on at two laboratories. DR, SONDHAUS: Tle 5 centimeter dose will certainly | Dk