19 DR. DUNNING: As I recall it ran between 60 and 76 from the survey team readings. As I say, after considering so many factors, one,that most of these readings are tdaen nine days later, and when you start extrapolating ack, if your exponent is off, you can be off quite a bit. Other things, how long the people stayed there, et cetera. It seemed that the film badges worn by personnel, and there were three, might be as close as one might hope to come. Alderson Reporting Company Washington, D. C, DR. ll accepting for the Air Weather Service people, 12 calculated dose which was mentioned here would also hold 13 for the actual dose that would be shown by film badges, 14 that calculated for the Rongelap people? DR. DUNNING: and the I thought of that, Dr. Bugher. and I 16 don't have the firm answer. 17 however, that the Air Weather personnel had metal barracks, 18 and they were indoors an appreciable amount of time before 19 evacuatiom. I would like to point out this, The attenuation a@these metal barracks -- if you 20 will just be patient here for a moment -- here is one with a 21 factor of two, and so forth. 23 i Las \ Historias bl. . - DR. BUGHER: So the calculated figure here of 60 and 75 did not include a factor for the buildings? 25 Department of So one might expect that the film badges would show less than the calculated. 24 Raw fiw that the relationship between the film badge figure, which we are 15 ase Do you think, Gordon, 10 , ae ARC BUGHER: DR. DUNNING: : ae No, it does not. I think that is