102 every American, he found some anticularopacities, but which he felt were congenital or at least non-significant from a radiation point of view. DR. DUNHAM: It would be awfully soon to he gettng significance. HAJ. HANSEN: Yes. did have an antictlar opacity. the value of having tis. Alderson Reporting Company Washington, D. C to state that le This is down, Dr. Lowry was perfecty willing didn't feel that it could be due to the radiation, but at the same time it may bring up a problem in 11 the future. CDR. ETTER: 12 13 In that connection, Lesinsky has screened all the affected crew members, and he has found an 14 18 per cent 16 which he contends cannot be distingusi hed from those which 16 might be due to radiation. 17 two individuals who showed marked lens changes, both wf whom 18 had received heavy radiation in adolescence for acne. 19 something that mus t be considered in their past history. 21 incidence in what he calls the normal opacities, MR. HARRIS: Out of his group he discarded The incidence of congenital opacity DR. DUNHAM: Are there any other possible ultimate 23 effects? 24 enough to even begin to think about it? ARC 25 acapiment Of Energy. iice Historians Ov That if in mice happens to be in the neighborhood of 18 per cent also 22 ARCHIVES and points out 10 20 mn u One of the Air Force personnel How about aging? CDR. CRONKITE: Is this population group large I don't think it is conceivable to ! [o: