Dr, Paul Henshaw
DR. HENSHAW wes introduced to discuse the development of scientific
category classification system which he tas been working on for
some time. It has been agreed that the research
within the DEM program should be classified and

SCIENTIFIC
CATEGORY
CLASSIFICATION

recorded in a manner that would make the information
readily available. After much study, it was decided
to employ McBee Keysort cards at least as a beginning
and then if the volume of material and its use
warranted, the system could then be transferred to

punch cards to be used in an IBM Machine.
A sample
of the card to be used is included as Appendix C.
It is estimated that there are between five hundred and one-thousand
projects in operation within the national laboratories in addition
to between a thousard and fifteen hundred in research contracts.

DR. HENSHAW reviewed similar card systems used at Brookhaven (in
the field of the Effects of Radiation on Plants) and by Dr. Hollander
in Oak Ridge.

He also told of the effort of the Bureau of Standards

to simplify patent searches employing a similar method.

DR. BUGHER

pointed out that the keysort type of card is very helpful and

practicable for comparatively small operations, but for large programs, even the IBM type of card can become inadequate because of
the high scanning speeds required.
He pointed out the high rate

at which scientific literature is being increased.

DR. GLASS told

of his experience in editing SCIENCE.
In this case it was
advantageous tc obtain identifying key terms, phrases, and
from the authors for the purpose of classifying the report
indexing.
He suggested that it might be useful to require

found
ideas
for
the con-

tractors and their advisors to classify their own work rather than

depending upon the DBM staff to do it.
DR. HENSHAW proposed
supplying contractors with a catalogue of activities for the purpose

of assisting the contractors in classifying their own programs.

References were made to thelibrary service to be initiated by the

Ford Foundation in Washington and also the Biological Chemical In-

formation Services also in Washington with which this program might

be eventually integrated.

DR. SHILLING and his staff were congratulated on their efforts and
on the great amount of work which had been done within the last
four months to solve a number of problems raised at the last ACBM
meeting.

(The meeting was adjourned for a brief recess.)

Select target paragraph3