The numerical options. .. j+. .. . ......... .....- factors of .50 percent gonadal exposure for in Appendix considering 111. therein individual The detailed predicted. ..._— will .. guidance that exposure exposures rationale The resulting should for by the and 20 percent for cannot these guides be reduced for reductions planning Thyroid and bone marrow - Rem/yr 0.75 Rem/yr 0.75 Rem/yr - Since there general is no adequate guidance guidance for can only servative scientific cleanup . of be developed assumptions concerning c b. co 239 40 pCi/gm of soil operations 40 to 400 pCi/gm of soil case-by-case considering > 400 pCi/gm of soil contaminated factors? - corrective basis* which would on a case-by-case and safe~y Pu cleanup information plutonium Task Group recommends the following a. actions 4 Rem in 30 yr Gonads - . provided cleanup 0.25 Bone - . ....> ............... .. is then be: Whole body ● be precisely With for this soil, using con- in mind, the use in making decisions at Enewetak: action - corrective - corrective basis support not required. action all determined radiological acticm on a conditions. required. ASSESSMENT OF DOSES AND THE RESULTS OF’A.LTEPJJATIVE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS The Task Group approach for the radiological a number of the procedure ....... .... ““-”’”3 for cleanup alternatives involved exposure reduction steps: ....- ..... .. ...... . .......... ..—. *See Appendix III of and rehabitation for four development for-additional guidance. -5- of judgments Enewetak that and recommendations was to consider may be feasible. Basically,