-tateny TABLE 3.21 - Comparison of Radiation Field with Surface Density of Fallout Components (Concluded) Sample Total Gamma Count per bottle (e/m x 1077at 1 hr) 30259.07c 3-251 02 3-Cocea TC 3<Coca 3C 3@250,08 L=¥39 4-40? L=¥08 7,100 9,900 tstimated Equivalent Field (rfnr at 1 hr) 380 520 14,400 770 9 yO00 510 900 2,300 660 2,000 50 120 40 119(t) Ratio of Field to Corel Sur- Ratio of Field to Sea Water (r/orimg/aq ft) (r/nrim/aq et} ( r/ar ifrection/sq ft: face Density Surface Densit 0.071 0.014 0.21 0.14 0 - ~ - 2 220 53 26 - ll - - (a) Average of Rad Safe and/or Freject 2,5a surveys (see Project 2,54 report) (b) Estimate from Project €.4 preliminery uncorrected data (see text! Ratio of Field to Device Frectional Density 0.6 2.9 2.9 1.2 79