No rain fell between shot time and sample recovery so the chemical gesposition of island stations was affected only by the coral sand which was blown in by the wind. TABLE 3.1 = Samples from Shot 1 Weight (a) (grams) 14.85 61.98 23.11 12.90 2.87 37.31 3.85 120.69 0251.03 15.46 #251 ,04 251.05; 32.54 107.01 Total Count(a) at B+14.1 da (¢/m x 1077 Gamma Beta 3.02 2.25 5.97 1.22 0.0188 0.183 4.93 1.67 0.0035| 0.112 2.63 1.47 0.0607 0.0275; 111.0 61.0 14.0 11.4 Description Slurry(>) <3 3;sampler lid open Slurry Slurry Selid and 3;sampler lid open 33sampler worked lssempler may have Slurry Slurry Slurry Slurry liqvid worked 8.59 0.246 7.34 0.045 Solid(wet) Solid and lscampler open lysampler open 3;sampler open l;may not have liquid 3.67 0.0090 0.194 0.0053} Solid(wet) Solid(dry) 251.08 0.373 - - Solid(éry) 0.0279 0.0113] Solid(dry) opened 33;no information ljsampler worked (a) Data on single bottle basis (c) Number indicates bottles combined at the time of pickup (b) 3el.2 lid open lid open worked lid open 3;sampler open liquid 1.53 0.802 1.50 3;sampler 33sampler 3ssampler 33;sampler Solid and #25106 =251.07 @251.10 Comments (¢) Slurry - appearance of sea water plus slaked lime suspension Samples from Shot 2 Samples collected on Elmer at R+1 hr from very light fallout were used only for decay measurements, The samples from Project 2.5a were received at the field laboratory on R+2 days; they are described in Table 3, 2. The total counts, as given, include the activity on the funnels as well as that in the bottles. In general, the funnels were more conteminated than the bottles, especially for the dry samples. The flags on the buoy mast of the “loating stations collected very large amounts of fellout. On station RL, for example, the bottle read 60 mr/h, the funnel 400 mr/h, and the flag 9000 mr/h at R+2.1 days. Rain fell over scattered areas between the placement and recovery of the samplers for Shot 2, 29