-tateny
TABLE 3.21 - Comparison of Radiation Field with Surface Density of Fallout Components (Concluded)
Sample
Total Gamma Count
per bottle
(e/m x 1077at 1 hr)
30259.07c
3-251 02
3-Cocea TC
3<Coca 3C
3@250,08
L=¥39
4-40?
L=¥08
7,100
9,900
tstimated Equivalent Field
(rfnr at 1 hr)
380
520
14,400
770
9 yO00
510
900
2,300
660
2,000
50
120
40
119(t)
Ratio of Field
to Corel Sur-
Ratio of Field
to Sea Water
(r/orimg/aq ft)
(r/nrim/aq et} ( r/ar ifrection/sq ft:
face Density
Surface Densit
0.071
0.014
0.21
0.14
0
-
~
-
2
220
53
26
-
ll
-
-
(a)
Average of Rad Safe and/or Freject 2,5a surveys (see Project 2,54 report)
(b)
Estimate from Project €.4 preliminery uncorrected data (see text!
Ratio of Field to
Device Frectional
Density
0.6
2.9
2.9
1.2
79