TABLE 3.21 - Comparison of Radiation Field with Surface Density of Fallout Comnonents
Sample
Total Gamma Count
per bottle
(c/m x 10°? at 1 hr)
Estimated Equivalent Field
(r/hr at 1 hr)
Ratio of Field
to Coral Sur-
|Ratio of Field
to Sea “%ater
Ratio of Field to
Device Frectional
face Density
|Surfece Density
Density
(rf/primg/sq ft)|(r/oriml/sq rt) (r/nr:fraction/s9 ft)
x
1-250.04
1-250.05
* 250.06
2,400
4,800
1,500
100(8)
go(8)
goa)
1-250.22
150
26(8)
89 ,000
11,000
6,900
200
2,900
10
1,650(8)
600(a)
350(8
219(8)
60(8)
22(a)
1250.17
94
1+250.24
1+250.25
1+251.02
1-251,03
1-251 .04
1-251 .05
1-251.06
1+251.07
1-251.08
1-251.10
2-AL,
2-85
2-04
2-P4
15
2,100
50
20
2,200
1,700
40
2
50(8)
2a(a)
30/2)
192)
30(a)
120
90
2
0.1
2-24
2-Ré,
2,000
9,000
110
480
2-139
2-¥40
3-250.05B
3-250.05R
310
2,600
8,300
&,500
20
140)
440
450
4,500
240
2-Th
3-250.07a
3-250 07%
1,700
4,500
90
240
0.035
0.024
0.057
c
0
0
9
19
15
o
6
1
0
0.048
0.13
0
0
0.4
0.15
0.15
0.003
1.7
0.01
0.607
0.01
0.005
29
6
~
23
69
15
0.14
0.039
0.056
C.038 |
WAV
0
C
0
0
0
0
O
12
14
9
-
48
120
15
25
5
80
350
28
120
110
22
15
2
24
34
-
13
25
°
18
uw
Led
2.2
9
1.1.
8
0.9