(
(~
.
aos
-29-
Mr. Murphree and Dr.. McMillan both urged that the sodium-heterogeneous
approach should not be neglected,
Dr. Rabi suggested the Committee
not make a recommendation on this at present.
He suggested that the
- report ask for detailed information, to be supplied by Commission
staff, on the possibility of a program along this line.
p. 19.)
(Appendix D,
The desirability of a six-month review of the fluid fuel
approach was again brought out.
|
(Appendix D, p. 16.)
Dr. Rabi suggested that the report of the Reactor Subcommittee
be adopted as a report of the entire GAC.
Dr. Warner moved that this
report, as amended and revised in the light of the discussion, be
adopted as a report of the full Committee.
Mr. Murphree ‘seconded
the motion, and the motion was unanimously carried.
een
ee
ae ele.
item 1; and Appendix D.)
ReSeerotary!s Note:
Future
Agenda
Items
(Appendix B,
Two definite suggestions in this report
will give rise to future agenda items:
.
(1) The suggestion, p. 16, Appendix D, that a thorough review of
the fluid fuel ANP program of Oak Ridge and Pratt & Whitney,
directed toward a decision to continue or to modify the approach,
be held in about six months —- i.e., in May 1955.
(2)
The suggestion, p. 19, Appendix D, that the Reactor Division
draft a proposed program on the sodium cooled heterogeneous
ANP reactor, including type and scope of work and contractors,
which can be presented at the next meeting of the General
Advisory Committee.)
=e
|
4‘2D
Dy
&
“Og,
%2
8
Or
ro
3 TV