INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TRACE GASES AND RADIOACTIVITY

3805

40

~~—~—--— SSN
—

a —~ NNN

35/-|

ee 27/28. 8.56

|

22-3h

Experimental (WEXLER et al., 1955):
o—— 25.10. Pet Ohio
w——* 26.10. 1950
Calculated

2 JWN
20.5.56

NS

22-0h

12 7 56
0-4h
40

SSN, NNN, WNN

Relative Rn- concentration (cpm/g)

K-profile

50

~~

40

~~

50

WNW 7

r ground level under inve
rsion

2

{
4

1
6

!
8

i
10

12km

Altitude
ERNELAE:«te,

the NNW case (normal tur
buupper troposphere. The
mean
flights agrees rather well
with
orofile NNN for which the
Rn™
t an altitude of 2 km is
about
ncentration near ground
level,
onsistent with observati
ons of
tk [1928] and Wilkening
[1953].
on indicates that it is poss
ible
ertical profile of the tur
bulent
*nt from measurements
of the
an™ distribution. The avai
lable
thin the troposphere giv
e some
the K profile NNN, giv
en in
represents average turbul
ence

0
0

Fig. 4.

Comparison of observed and calculated relative Rn profiles in the troposphere.

conditions in the troposphere. If we assume

normal conditions of turbulence in the tropo-

sphere, i., the profile NNN in Figure 1, a
rather rapid decrease of the Rn™ concentration
should be expected in the tropopause. In this
case the part of the total activity in a vertical
column of air which reaches the layer above

12 to 13 km (mean altitude of the tropopause

in the temperate zone) is only about 1 to 2 per
cent. If we assume the K profile SSN (strong
tropospheric turbulence), however, this part in-

creases to about 10 to 15 per cent. This suggests
that considerable amounts of Rn™ can penetrate
through the tropopause into the lower stratosphere only during periods of strong vertical
turbulent mixing or convection, e.g. in case of
cumulonimbus formation.

Machta and Lucas [1962] recently reported
the first results of Rn™ measurements in the
tropopause and lower stratosphere which indicate new aspects of the exchange process
through the tropopause (Figure 5). The air

Select target paragraph3