RY toe ee ereae ate,

NaGIN
a
meen YES ¢ Wy

BELG wat

rITUZ Yuu aAUrFDNASSS7 11323 15-UlUU-mn he Give.

Arr 25

| 50 PH'T78

Zan UJIUU

P 2521152 APR 78

UR?

HM DOE/ERSP SNEwzTAK ATLL MI

ot LSP

10 DCE LAS VEGAS NEVADA

he TSee

3t

fey _

UNCLAS NGWWD
ge
aya
hoes
Tentna
PERSONAL FOR JON STEWART @AUCE ChUACK SENDSONL
uw
c.

ty

lay
BJeOTs
CoancLATIUN Of SGIL/IMP DATA

REP:

TeLECCN B. CHURCH ~ J. STEWART 242400 APR 78

1, SUBSEQUENT TO REFERENCED TELECON, PRELININARY TATA FROM TRE SOL!
SAMPLE LAPORATORY HAVE SEEN RECEIVED WHICH SHEDS NEW LIGHT Cu SOLL/

vATA AND AEC OMMEND THAT Any IiEARLIER
SOLELY ON
CONCLUSIONS BASED
dionUa
JWoSANL
eeEe
eeee
© Waiter kn
berTH DISCUSSICAS CONCERNING DATA DiSCnePanCiEs BeDELAYED

Fnnn ee et ee

saint bapaescanen SET

NEW DATA CAW BE

TRANSMITTED /DELIVEREG

JOTIL Tre

TO NVO.

THE NEW-IMP. DATA FROM ALICE INDICATES 4 RATIO CF WeWw/OLD OF 1. fe

AVERAGED

OVER SIK LOCATIONS THAT WERE REPEATED FROM Th

SURVEYED.

my

2.

.

The rnaATIO FROM FOUR CF THESE LOCATIONS IS

GrlalNaAL

1.8 OR GAREATEX.

FROM FOUR SOIL LOCATIONS ThE AVERAGE RATIO LucLUvIha A AND B CUMPOSITES IS

1.5,

howEVEA SCKE A AND B COMPOSITES VARY AWIvELY CI owe

CASE GREATER AN 2).

mi oon

we SUGGEST IT wCULD BE raz ATURE Tc benlVeCARY,

rw

IMP COMPARISONS.

ThE SOIL/IMP RATIO IS

1.3 BASED CN TxO LCC-

Y

Select target paragraph3