The distribution of plutonium in the different particle size classes and in

depth shows an interesting trend. Consider the desert pavement, for example,
where the bulk of the acitivity in the first two depths is in the sand sizes
and the activity in the second layer is about 2% of that in the surface layer.

In the lower two layers, the silt and clay sizes contain the major fraction of
In Table 1, the plutonium concentrations in the depth
the soil activity.
increments of the desert pavement suggest a possible accumulation in the 7.5 The change in percentage contribution by the finer sizes in
10.0 cm layer.
the lower depths also suggests downward migration of activity, providing
The movement of plutonium downward into
further support for this hypothesis.

the lower soil horizons at the Nevada Test Site has also been observed by
Essington et al. (1975), including several soils in Area 11.

The distribution of plutonium with depth in the desert mound sample is more
Unlike the desert pavement, which shows an abrupt
difficult to explain.
decrease in activity below the surface layer, the desert mound shows a gradual
Furthermore, unlike the desert pavement,
decrease in activity with depth.
which shows an abrupt change in particle size distribution above and below the
2.5-cm depth, the desert mound shows a gradual change in the particle size
distribution with depth, with the deepest sample approaching a particle size
This
distribution similar to that in the lower layers of the desert pavement.
gradual change in particle size distribution with depth in the desert mound
suggests that considerable mixing of the original soil has occurred in the

secondary deposit.

Considering the closeness (30.7 feet) of the mound to GZ,

the possible mechanical disturbance during preparation of the site, and the

fact that these data are the result of a single sampling of one mound, further

interpretations or speculations about the depth distribution of plutonium in
Area 11 is not warranted.

Density Gradient Segregation and Plutonium Distribution
In order to further characterize the plutonium in the desert pavement and
desert mound samples, selected size fractions were subjected to density gradient
segregation.
The technique separates minerals with different densities by
allowing them to accumulate at their respective mineral density positions in
the linear density gradient solution.
To date, the three silt sizes of the
surface layers have been separated in this manner.
The results presented in

Table 5 include the density range or bands in which the particles concentrated,
the weight of the particles, and the percent activity in each of the bands.
The activity measurements were obtained with a portable alpha survey meter
placed over the dry powder; the activity percentages listed in the table,
therefore, should be considered as approximate indications of the distribution
and not as definitive values.

Results show that as the particles get smaller, their densities become lighter.
This observation is consistent with mineral hydration (in these cases, the
polyvinylpyrrolidone substitutes for water), which increases the effective
diameter and reduces the particle density.
There is an indication that the
desert mound particles in the 20 - 5 and 5 - 2 wm size classes are lower in

density than the corresponding size classes in the desert pavement.

In the

study of a desert pavement-desert mound system in Area 13 (600 feet from GZ)
reported earlier (Tamura, 1975b), the 53 - 20 um size particles of the two

10

Select target paragraph3