Table 23

MeanLevels of Peripheral Blood Elements of Populations Under Study
Piat. ( x 10°")

WBC (x 10-+)

1965

1966

Rongelap exposed

2742 75*(56)**

—

7.392%1.7 (56)

Rongelap unexposed

Ailingnae exposed
Utirik exposed

342> 95 (16)
—

1965

—
-——

Neut. ( x 107°)
1966

7LQZHLA (16)
—

1965

682271.8(55)

1966

3.69+1.2 (56)

6.2422.3(15)
8.05 + 2.3199)

3.7721.5 (16)
—

3.5741.4(54)

3.301.9(15)
4.452-1.8(98)

Rongelap children of
exposed parent(s)
Rongelap children of

282> 71(124)

—

7.34%2.2( 124)

—

3.86 1.8(125)

—

416130 (48)

—

10.17%2.5 (48)

—

4.4122.0 (48)

—

unexposed parents

3662 96 (69)

_

9912.6 (69)

—

4.52+1.9 (69)

—

Lymph. ( x 10°')

Het. (%)

RBC ( x 10°*)

1965

1966

1965

1966

1965

1966

Rongelap exposed
Ailingnae exposed
Uurik exposed
Rongelap unexposed

2.99+0.8 (56)
2.73+0.8 (16)
—
2.82— 1.0( 124)

2.45+0.8(54)
231209015)
3.00 1.0(.98 3
—

402748 (56)
39.625.0 (16)
—
40.5==5.0( 124)

39 +4.3(48)
39.744.6(15)
41.3227.0(88)
—

427257 (50)
438253 (16)
—
443253(11L)

—
—
__
—

exposed parent(s)
Rongelap children of
unexposed parents

4+.78+1.9 (48)

44141 (44)

—

439-34 (64)

—

Rongeilap children of

—

4.5541.5 (69)

*Standard deviation.

until the organ or tissue shows advanced morbidity.
It is hoped that longitudinal studies of aging
criteria in Rongelap individuals and groups may
be more rewardingas time goes by.
HEMATOLOGICAL STUDIES

Hematological data are summarized in tables
andfigures below, and the raw dataon individuals

are presented in the appendices. The more heavily
exposed Rongelap group whoreceived 175 rads
are designated as ““Rongelap exposed,” the Rongelap people whoreceived a smaller exposure of
69 rads as “Ailingnae exposed,” and the larger unexposed comparison population of Rongelap as

“unexposed.” Because of the small number of
people in the Ailingnae group, their data were not
treated as fully as those for the Rongelap groups,
and are briefly summarized in a separate paragraph, The Utirik data are summarized separately
also. Because of certain differences noted in age
and sex groups between the exposed and the unexposed, in addition to the comparisons of mean

37.143.5 (48)

—

36.4424 (69)

.

**Numberof people in group.

levels for entire groups, comparisons are also made

of age and sex groups. Ages 12 to 15, >15 to 40,
and > 40 years for each sex are compared.

The hematological data are summarized in
Table 23 and in Figures 49 through 65. In Ap-

pendices 8, 9, and 10 are presented summaries of

the mean blood counts of the exposed populations
and of the various comparison populationssince
exposure in March 1954. In Appendices 11 and
12 are listed the individual blood counts for 1965
and 1966. In Appendix 13 basophil counts are
presented. In 1966, hematological studies (ex-

cluding platelets) were done only on the exposed

populations of Rongelap, Ailingnae, and Utirik.
Rongelap Population

Leukocytes. The mean leukocyte levels were

slightly lower at 11 years than at 10 years post

exposure in both exposed and unexposed Rongelap people. At 12 years the exposed (unexposed
not done) showed slightly lower levels than in

1965 (see Appendix 8). There was no appreciable

difference in the exposed and unexposed leukocyte

Select target paragraph3