-i7- Paragraph 82 ERDA's SUGGESTED RESPONSE AND/OR COMMENTS (Continued) and dose evaluations by Dr. Philip Gustafson indicating that radiation exposures near federal standards for the general public are to be expected. On the other hand, there was a report by James T. Hiyane, District Agriculturist, indicating that the Bikini people on “Kili are resentful and dissatisfied with life on Kili, they want to go home, and they anticipate a return to Bikini and have no desire to exert energy in improving Kili. Also there was a report by Jack A. Tobin, Anthropologist, indicating the people have experienced difficulty adjusting to Kili, they have feelings of tsolation and confinement, they refuse to accept the move to Kili as final, they say Kili is no good, it is like a prison, there is not enough food, and they have not made a whole-hearted attempt to adjust to Kili and want to return to Bikini. The small risk associated with radiation exposures near the standards was found by the experts to be acceptable when viewed along side the great benefits to be received. The benefits overbalanced the risks to a considerable degree. ARCHIV In the seven years since the judgment on resettlement, the radiation standards have not changed although there is somewhat more conservative application. What has changed is the 77 Enclosure }