36

EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION

third to the sixth or eighth day, and was characterized by a more severe erythema; (3) The
third phase at 8 to 12 days, was characterized
by vesicle and bullae formation. The erythema
spread to new areas during the following 2
weeks, and the active process subsided by 24 to
32 days. The bullae dried up, and desquamation and epithelization took place in_ less
severely damaged areas; (4) The fourth phase
or chronic stage was characterized by further
breakdown of skin with necrosis in areas which
were damaged sufficiently to compromise the
blood supply. Atrophy of the epidermis and
loss of epithelial structures took place, which
necessitated skin grafting in somecases.
Robbinse¢ a/. (7) reported six cases accidentally exposed over muchof their bodies to scattered cathode rays from a 1200 kv primary
beam with exposure time of about 2 minutes
and a rough estimation of dose to the skin of
between 1000 and 2000 rep. The lesions described were similar to those reported by
Knowlton e¢ af. with a primary erythema developing within 36 hours; secondary erythema
with vesiculation and bullae formation appearing about 12 to 14 days later; and, in the
more severely affected, a tertiary phase characterized by further breakdown of the skin.
In comparison with severe roentgen ray reactions these investigators stressed the unique
periodicity of cathode ray burns, relative absence of deep damage to the skin, less pain,

greater rapidity of healing, and absence of

pigmentation. These points would apply to
the Marshallese lesions except for the multiphasic reactions and absence of pigmentation.
Crawford (8) reports a case of cathode ray
burns of the hands which were similar to those
described by Robbinse¢ ai.
Experimental beta radiation burns in human beings have been reported by Low-Beer
(9) and Wirth and Raper (10). Both inves-

tigators used P*? discs applied to the flexor
surface of the arms, forearms, or thighs for
varying lengths of time. Low-Beer reported
“monophasic” skin reactions. He found that a
calculated dose of 143 rep to the first millimeter of skin, ignoring self-absorption, pro-

5003121

duced a threshold erythema.

Dry, scaly, des-

quamation was produced by 7200 rep in the
first millimeter and bullous, wet desquamation

was produced by 17,000 rep to the first milli-

meter. Erythema developed in 3 to 4 days,
followed later by pigmentation and desquama-

tion with higher doses.

Recovery was ob-

served with doses of 17,000 rep. The lesions
later showed depigmented centers with hyperpigmented edges (also seen in the present
cases).
Wirth and Raper (10) produced primary
erythema within 6 hours after exposure to a
dose of 635 to 1180 rep of P® radiation. _ Mi-

nute vesicles with dry, spotty desquamation
were noted with 1180 rep at about the fifth to
sixth weeks post-exposure.
Twenty-three Japaneses fishermen were exposed to the same fallout material which involved the Marshallese and Americans. There
were many similarities in appearance of skin
lesions that developed. Pigmentation wasalso
common in the Japanese and some degree of
erythema was reported (11) which wasnot seen
in the Marshallese. Distribution of lesions was

not the same dueto different parts of the body

being protected by clothing. For example, in
the Japanese scalp lesions and epilation were
more common on the crown of the head since
handkerchiefs were usually worn around the
head leaving the crown exposed. Shoes protected the feet of the Japanese, but lesions of
the hands between thumbandindexfinger were
common, apparently due to handling contami-

nated fishing lines. Lesions with belt line dis-

tribution occurred in the Japanese fishermen
but not the Marshallese. Similar mild lesions
were observed on several American sailors who

were on ships of the task force exposed to fall-

out. From available information, the severity
and course of the lesions in the Japanese fishermen appeared to be similar to those seen in the
Rongelap Marshallese group.
The lesions in this report did not follow
precisely the same course as those beta radiation

lesions described by Knowlton, Robbins, and

others (6-10) and they presented certain unique
features which merit further discussion.

Select target paragraph3