A. ITT. 101 O. Paaxkxona, R. NASANEN, D. MERTEN and J. K. Mrerrinen, Strontium 90 Analyses of the grass samples Atomizer). ries of the thod on a rer Bunsen e in quartz ‘orrespondlorgan and re made as immonium sarated by osferred to um carrier 9 Grass samples from the farms (Nos. 1—9) representing the plots on which the cattle had been kept during the last 2—3 weeks, were dried on the farms in a dust-free place and ca. 10 kg of airdry grass was sent in a paper bag to the laboratory where it was burnt to ash in the same way as the milk samples. 10 g of ash was used for each analysis. The chemical separation of Sr was made by the method of Bryant et al. (14) with the same exceptions as in the milk analyses (see above). However, the grass ash was dissolved in a mixture of perchloric and nitric acids by the method of Bryant, Chamberlain, Morgan and Spicer (15). The yield of strontium andthe radioactivity of the yttrium precipitates were determined as for the milk samples. Caletum was determined permanganometrically, as for a part of the milk powder samples. For dry weight determinations the grass was kept at 105—110°C for 20 hours. days. d from the ammonia. ‘lask for a s dissolved was added The results The results of the milk analyses are represented in Table 2, those of the grass analyses in Table 3. serformed. Table 2 ie remain) The cenation was Results of calcium and “Sr analyses of the milk samples of Table 1. elss) using strontium ed with a d of 1.2— ples grav© samples vith 0.1 N rit for 24 les varied Sample No. Ca % of ash Sr, Sr, upuc/kg of Hucig of ash dry weight Sr, fuc/g Ca I 16.6 0.61 35.2 3.7 2 15.5 1.00 55.4 6.7 3 4 5 6 7 17.5 16.2 14.3 16.0 16.8 0.79 0.67 0.52 0.78 1.12 45.0 35.3 30.0 43.7 61.6 4.5 4.2 3.6 4.9 6.6 8 16.6 0.98 53.0 5.9 9 17.3 2.01 96.5 11.6 10 11 12 13 14 15 16.5 16.8 16.4 17.4 17.1 16.5 1.61 1.63 1.31 1.47 1.36 1.41 118 125 96.3 118 106 109 9.8 9.7 8.0 8.4 7.9 8.6

Select target paragraph3