7 about 18% ithe calculation cannot be relied upon other than as a check conditions rate is from > in the in most on a careful >ffects, jiation an 3 reduced The The value of the ff; onization current per ur/hr for gamma rays obtained by Fcalculation was 4.45 x 10714 amperes. This calculation is given in detail in Appendix 1. reareful determined ypted to ha-rays experimental calibration. lwas calibration using an NBS The value obtained from a standardized radium source (4.60 + .10) x 10714 amperes/ur/hr. The latter value lwas also obtained (to within 2%) using less accurately i standardized 60¢59 and 137cs sources. The calibration iprocedure adequately accounts for the effect of scattered igamma-rays from the laboratory floors and ceiling by careful Fshadow shielding of the source. Both of the above calibration ‘factors are for 59 atmospheres of gas and normal incidence fof gamma rays to the chamber axis. | The calculation of ionization current per ur/hr for cosmic 3 pressure ‘radiation ost due to co gas »£ electrons ss than 1% ionization produced inal atm. argon filling to that which ‘would be produced in 1 atm. of air, but this time the incident fparticles are primarily high energy electrons and muons rather than gamma-rays. In the gamma ray case the ratio of ionization 1own to to gamma again requires the determination of the relative produced in argon relative to air depends primarily on the irelative Compton cross sections for the two media while in ithe cosmic ray case this ratio depends on the relative values of the mass energy stopping powers 1 calculations electronic particles.**’ 7eé contamjligible 1i1t dose for minimum ionizing These ratios are not necessarily the same although they do turn out to be guite similar. The theoretical stopping power prediction for the number of ion pairs produced in argon to that in air per unit flux is about '1.51,797° However, measurements of this quantity made by Several investigators under thick shields sufficient to shield ays can be Out all particles except muons predict a value of about juires an ses and the effects of the wall, we calculate a cosmic ray calibration factor of 5.01 x 10714 amperes/ (ur/hr). (See Appendix 1) jamma rays the wall suring the rlinders of From our independently derived cosmic ray ionization curve VS. pressure altitude and calculated values of the total ionization intensity at sea level® we deduce a value of ,5.09 x 10714 amperes/ur/hr. The latter value is used lis calculaynization tonsidering ; as well ig pressure, peg ge wn [1.69,2¥22*3 (corrections If we use the latter value along with slight for the attenuating and electron enhancement froutinely. The agreement of the two calibration factors given above ‘Suggests a significant discrepancy between the experimental - ~o 3f

Select target paragraph3